THE MODELS FOR COMPANY’S HUMAN CAPITAL ESTIMATION, BASED ON THE CONCEPT OF STOCHASTIC FRONTIER

Aivazian, Sergey; Afanasiev, Mikhail

English

Home>Issue 3>THE MODELS FOR COMPANY’S HUMAN CAPITAL ESTIMATION, BASED ON THE CONCEPT OF STOCHASTIC FRONTIER

THE MODELS FOR COMPANY’S HUMAN CAPITAL ESTIMATION, BASED ON THE CONCEPT OF STOCHASTIC FRONTIER

Table of contents

Annotation Estimate Publication content

References Comments

THE MODELS FOR COMPANY’S HUMAN CAPITAL ESTIMATION, BASED ON THE CONCEPT OF STOCHASTIC FRONTIER

Annotation

PII

S042473880000621-2-1

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Sergey Aivazian Send message Mikhail Afanasiev

Edition

Volume 48 Issue 3

Pages

45-63

Abstract

In development of methodology of estimation of company’s productive potential is offered approach to the estimation of her human capital, based on the concept of stochastic frontier. The results of empiric analysis of human capital of scientific organization are presented, supporting the possibility of the proposed approach application for the estimation of volume and efficiency of human capital of both company and her employees.

Keywords

the intellectual capital, the human capital, factors of the human capital, efficiency of the human capital, econometric model

Date of publication

20.07.2012

Number of purchasers

Views

686

Readers community rating

0.0 (0 votes)

Cite Download pdf

GOST	Afanasiev M., Aivazian S. THE MODELS FOR COMPANY’S HUMAN CAPITAL ESTIMATION, BASED ON THE CONCEPT OF STOCHASTIC FRONTIER // Economics and the Mathematical Methods. – 2012. – V. 48. – Issue 3 C. 45-63 .
MLA	Afanasiev, Mikhail, Aivazian, Sergey "THE MODELS FOR COMPANY’S HUMAN CAPITAL ESTIMATION, BASED ON THE CONCEPT OF STOCHASTIC FRONTIER." Economics and the Mathematical Methods. 48.3 (2012).:45-63.
APA	Afanasiev M., Aivazian S. (2012). THE MODELS FOR COMPANY’S HUMAN CAPITAL ESTIMATION, BASED ON THE CONCEPT OF STOCHASTIC FRONTIER. Economics and the Mathematical Methods. vol. 48, no. 3, pp.45-63


1

References

Additional sources and materials

Ajvazyan S.A., Afanas'ev M.Yu. (2009): Otsenka ehkonomicheskoj ehffektivnosti perekhoda k dostizhimomu potentsialu // Prikladnaya ehkonometrika. № 3.

Ajvazyan S.A., Afanas'ev M.Yu. (2010): Chelovecheskij kapital kompanii v modeli ee proizvodstvennogo potentsiala // Vestnik GUU. № 2.

Ajvazyan S.A., Afanas'ev M.Yu. (2011): Modelirovanie proizvodstvennogo potentsiala kompanii s uchetom ee intellektual'nogo kapitala. M.: TsEhMI RAN.

Ajvazyan S.A., Afanas'ev M.Yu., Makarov V.L. (2008): Modelirovanie dostizhimogo proizvodstvennogo potentsiala i otsenka ehffektivnosti proizvodstva na osnove metodologii stokhasticheskoj granitsy. M.: TsEhMI RAN.

Afanas'ev M.Yu. (2006): Model' proizvodstvennogo potentsiala s upravlyaemymi faktorami neehffektivnosti // Prikladnaya ehkonometrika. № 4.

Makarov V.L. (2008): Iskusstvennye obschestva i buduschee obschestvennykh nauk. SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGUP.

Makarov V.L. (2009): Obzor matematicheskikh modelej ehkonomiki s innovatsiyami // Ehkonomika i mat. metody. T. 45. № 1.

Makarov V.L., Klejner G.B. (2007): Mikroehkonomika znanij. M.: Ehkonomika.

Ushkova V.L. (2011): Individual'nyj rejting nauchnogo rabotnika. M.: TsEhMI RAN.

Battese C. (1988): Prediction of Firm-level Technical Effi ciencies with a Generalized Frontier Production Function and Panel Data // J. of Econometrics. Vol. 38. P. 387–399.

Vesker G. (1964): Human Capital. N.Y.: Columbia University Press.

Bourdieu P. (1986): The Forms of Capital // Handbook of theory and research for sociology of Education. Ed. By J. Richardson. N.Y.: Greenwood Press. P. 21.

Kumbhakar S., Lovell K. (2004): Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P. R. 86.

Mincer J. (1975): Schooling, Experience and Earnings. N.Y.: National Bureau of Economic Research Press.

Mulligan C.B., Sala-i-Martin X. (1995): Measuring Aggregate Human Capital. Discussion Paper Series № 1149, Centre for Economic Policy Research Press.

Ordones de Pablos P. (2005): Intellectual capital statements: what pioneering fi rms from Asia and Europe are doing now // International J. of Knowledge and Learning. Vol. 1. № 3. P. 249–268.

Pitt M.M., Lee L.F. (1981): Measurement and Sources of Technical Ineffi ciency in the Indonesian Weaving Industry // J. of Development Econ. Vol. 9. R. 43–64.

Reifschneider D., Stevenson R. (1991): Systematic Departures from the Frontier: A Framework for the Analysis of Firm Ineffi ciency // International Econ. Review. Vol. 32. R. 715–723.

Schultz T. (1960): Capital Formation by Education // J. of Political Econ. Vol. 68. № 6, University of Chicago Press.

Sveiby K.-E. (2010): Methods for Measuring Intangible Assets. [Ehlektronnyj resurs] Rezhim dostupa: http:// www.sveiby.com/articles/IntangibleMethods.htm, svobodnyj. Zagl. s ehkrana. Yaz. angl. (data obrascheniya: fevral' 2012 g.)

Taymaz E., Saatçi G. (1997): Technical Change and Effi ciency in Turkish Manufacturing Industries // J. of Productivity Analysis. Vol. 8. P. 461–475.