ROLE OF FIRMS OF THE DIFFERENT SIZES ON SEPARATE PHASES OF A LONG WAVE
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
ROLE OF FIRMS OF THE DIFFERENT SIZES ON SEPARATE PHASES OF A LONG WAVE
Annotation
PII
S042473880000621-2-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Pages
33-46
Abstract
Proved that the effective configuration of corporate sector can’t be based on the same size of fi rms. Evolution of the structure of this sector is considered in a context of long waves of economic development. With reference to separate phases of a long wave it is discussed, what specific properties of business of the different sizes define its comparative advantages on these phases. Character of evolution of corporate sector is illustrated by the statistical data of the USA economy.
Keywords
long waves, sizes of firms, crisis, technological revolution
Date of publication
10.10.2012
Number of purchasers
1
Views
747
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

Abt F. (2011). Inertnost' tyazhelovesov. Nebol'shoj biznes imeet suschestvennye preimuschestva po sravneniyu s tyazhelovesnymi korporatsiyami // RBK. № 11.

Akaev A.A. (2009). Sovremennyj finansovo-ehkonomicheskij krizis v svete teorii innovatsionno-tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya. V kn.: “Monitoring global'nykh i regional'nykh riskov 2008/2009” / Pod red. D.A. Khalturina, A.V. Korotaeva. M.: URSS. S. 141–162.

Akaev A.A., Sadovnichij V.A. (2009). O novoj metodologii dolgosrochnogo tsiklicheskogo prognozirovaniya dinamiki razvitiya mirovoj i rossijskoj ehkonomiki. V kn.: “Sistemnyj analiz i matematicheskoe modelirovanie mirovoj dinamiki” / Red. V.A. Sadovnichij i dr. M.: URSS.

Andrukovich P.F. (2005). Dolgosrochnaya i srednesrochnaya dinamika indeksa Dou-Dzhonsa // Problemy prognozirovaniya. № 2.

Bukhval'd E., Vilenskij A. (1999). Rossijskaya model' vzaimodejstviya malogo i krupnogo predprinimatel'stva // Voprosy ehkonomiki. № 2.

Van Dejn Ya. (1992). V kakoj faze kondrat'evskogo tsikla my nakhodimsya? // Voprosy ehkonomiki. № 10.

Galukhina Ya.S., Pappeh Ya.Sh. (2006). Rossijskij krupnyj biznes v 2000–2005 gg.: osnovnye napravleniya transformatsii i razvitiya // Problemy prognozirovaniya. № 3, 4.

Glaz'ev S.Yu. (2007). Razvitie rossijskoj ehkonomiki v usloviyakh global'nykh tekhnologicheskikh sdvigov. [Ehlektronnyj resurs] Nauchnyj doklad. Sergej Glaz'ev. Ofitsial'nyj sajt. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.glazev.ru/fi les/doklad_22marta.zip, svobodnyj. Zagl. s ehkrana. Yaz. rus. (data obrascheniya: fevral' 2012 g.).

Glaz'ev S.Yu. (2009). Mirovoj ehkonomicheskij krizis kak protsess smeny tekhnologicheskikh ukladov // Voprosy ehkonomiki. № 3.

Gonchar K.R. (2009). Innovatsionnoe povedenie sverkhkrupnykh kompanij: lenivye monopolii ili agenty modernizatsii? Preprint WP1/2009/02. M.: Izd. dom GU VShEh.

Grinin L.E., Korotaev A.V. (2009). Global'nyj krizis v retrospektive. Kratkaya istoriya pod'emov i krizisov: ot Likurga do Alana Grinspena. M.: LKI.

Dement'ev V.E. (2006). “Dogonyayuschaya postindustrializatsiya” i promyshlennaya politika, WP/2006/199. M.: TsEhMI RAN.

Dynkin A. (2003). Krupnyj biznes: faktor modernizatsii ili stagnatsii? [Ehlektronnyj resurs] Doklad na nauchnom seminare E.G. Yasina “Krupnyj rossijskij biz nes i problemy modernizatsii”. 20 maya 2003 g. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.nisse.ru/analitics.html?id=seminar_290103, svobodnyj. Zagl. s ehkrana. Yaz. rus. (data obrascheniya: fevral' 2012 g.).

Dynkin A.A., Sokolov A.V. (2002). Integrirovannye biznes-gruppy v rossijskoj ehkonomike // Voprosy ehkonomiki. № 4.

Egorova N.E. (1999). Modelirovanie deyatel'nosti malogo predpriyatiya, funktsioniruyuschego v ehkonomicheskom simbioze s krupnym promyshlennym ob'ektom // Ehkonomika i mat. metody. T. 35. Vyp. 2.

Egorova N.E., Majn E.R. (1997). Malyj biznes v Rossii: ehkonomicheskij analiz i modelirovanie. M.: TsEhMI RAN, ISEhPN RAN.

Egorova N.E., Khachatryan S.R., Koroleva N.V. i dr. (2001). Metody izmerenij vzaimodejstviya malogo i krupnogo biznesa v khode restrukturizatsii predpriyatij. M.: TsEhMI RAN.

Kondrat'ev N.D. (1989). Problemy ehkonomicheskoj dinamiki. M.: Ehkonomika.

Kondrat'ev N.D. (1993). Bol'shie tsikly kon'yunktury. Izbr. soch. M.: Ehkonomika.

Kristensen K.M. (2004). Dilemma innovatora. M.: Al'pina Biznes Buks.

Malinetskij G.G. (2005). Matematicheskie osnovy sinergetiki. Khaos, struktury, vychislitel'nyj ehksperiment. M.: URSS.

Opyt konkurentsii v Rossii (2007). Prichiny uspekhov i neudach. M.: KnoRus.

Pappeh Ya. (2002). Rossijskij krupnyj biznes kak ehkonomicheskij fenomen: osobennosti stanovleniya i sovremennogo ehtapa razvitiya // Problemy prognozirovaniya. № 1–2.

Piters T., Uotermen R. (1986). V poiskakh ehffektivnogo upravleniya (Opyt luchshikh kompanij). M.: Progress.

Predpriyatiya i rynki (2010). Predpriyatiya i rynki v 2005–2009 gg. Itogi dvukh raundov obsledovaniya rossijskoj obrabatyvayuschej promyshlennosti. Doklad GU VShEh. M.: Izd. dom GU VShEh.

RSE (2007). Rossijskij statisticheskij ezhegodnik – 2007 g. [Ehlektronnyj cajt] Rezhim dostupa: http:// www.gks.ru, svobodnyj. Zagl. s ehkrana. Yaz. rus. (data obrascheniya: fevral' 2012 g.).

Tendentsii izmeneniya (2009). Tendentsii izmeneniya struktury rossijskoj promyshlennosti v period ehkonomicheskogo pod'ema / Otv. red. S.B. Avdasheva, S.V. Golovanova. M.: ZAO «Yuridicheskij dom “Yustitsinform”».

Chernoj L.S. (2011). Natsional'naya korporativnaya sistema. Kontseptual'nye osnovy upravleniya ehffektivnost'yu. M.: Ehkonomicheskoe obrazovanie.

Shumpeter J. (1982). Teoriya ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya: Issledovanie predprinimatel'skoj pribyli, kapitala, kredita, protsenta i tsikla kon'yunktury. M.: Progress.

Yudanov A.Yu. (2006). Teoriya krupnogo predpriyatiya i perspektivy razvitiya rossijskoj ehkonomiki. Materialy Mezhdunarodnogo foruma “Proekty buduschego: mezhdistsiplinarnyj podkhod” 16–19 oktyabrya, g. Zvenigorod.

Yudanov A. (2007a). Genii natsional'nogo biznesa // Ehkspert. № 16 (557). 23 aprelya.

Yudanov A. (2007b). “Bystrye” firmy i ehvolyutsiya rossijskoj ehkonomiki // Voprosy ehkonomiki. № 2.

Yakovets Yu.V. (2001). Nasledie N.D. Kondrat'eva: vzglyad iz XXI veka. M.: MFK.

Yaponskaya ehkonomika (1991). Yaponskaya ehkonomika v preddverii XXI veka M.: Nauka, Glavnaya redaktsiya vostochnoj literatury.

Adams W., Brock J.W. (1987). The Bigness Complex. N.Y.: Pantheon Books.

Aghion A., Bloom N., Blundell R. et al. (2005). Competition and Innovation: An Inverted U Relationship // Quarterly J. of Econ. (May). P. 701–728.

BEA (2012). [Ehlektronnyj cajt] Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). U.S. Department of Sommerce. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.bea.gov, svobodnyj. Zagl. s ehkrana. Yaz. angl. (data obrascheniya: fevral' 2012 g.).

Hill C.W.L., Rothaermel F.T. (2003). The Performance of Incumbent fi rms in the Face of Radical Technological Innovation // Academy of Management Review. Vol. 28.

Hirooka M. (2006). Innovation Dynamism and Economic Growth. A Nonlinear Perspective. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Long Wave Theory (1996). Long Wave Theory (International Library of Critical Writings in Economics) / Christopher Freeman (ed.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

MSN.money (2012). [Ehlektronnyj resurs] Rezhim dostupa: http://money.msn.com/, svobodnyj. Zagl. s ehkrana. Yaz. angl. (data obrascheniya: fevral' 2012 g.).

Morita H., Nakahara H. (2004). Impacts of the Information-Technology Revolution on Japanese Manufacturer–Supplier Relationships // J. Japanese Int. Econ. Vol. 18.

Perez C. (2002). Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: The Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Perez C., Soete L. (1988). Catching up in Technology: Entry Barriers and Windows of Opportunity. In: Technical Change and Economic Theory. N.Y.: Pinter Publishers.

Pryor F.L. (2001). New Trends in U.S. Industrial Concentration. [Ehlektronnyj resurs] // Review of Industrial Organization. Vol. 18. № 3 Rezhim dostupa: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=255406, svobodnyj. Zagl. s ehkrana. Yaz. angl. (data obrascheniya: fevral' 2012 g.).

SBA.gov (2012). U.S. Small Business Administration, Offi ce of Advocacy. [Ehlektronnyj resurs] Rezhim dostupa: http://www.sba.gov/advocacy/849/12162#susb, svobodnyj. Zagl. s ehkrana. Yaz. angl. (data obrascheniya: fevral' 2012 g.).

Scherer F.M. (1984). Innovation and Growth. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Shah Ch.M., Ortt J.R., Scholten V. (2008). Building a Radical Innovation Mechanism at Large Firms. [Ehlektronnyj resurs] Rezhim dostupa: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1442530, svobodnyj. Zagl. s ehkrana. Yaz. angl. (data obrascheniya: fevral' 2012 g.).

Sharma A. (1999). Central Dilemmas of Managing Innovation in Large Firms // California Management Review. Vol. 41.

Stringer R. (2000). How to Manage Radical Innovation // California Management Review. Vol. 40. № 4.

The Long Wave Debate (1987). The Long Wave Debate. Selected papers from an IIASA meeting June 10–14. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Thomson Reuters (2011). Top 100 Global Innovators. [Ehlektronnyj resurs] Rezhim dostupa: http://www.top100innovators.com/top100, svobodnyj. Zagl. s ehkrana. Yaz. angl. (data obrascheniya: fevral' 2012 g.).

U.S. Census Bureau (2012). Table 1207 – Stock Prices and Yields in The 2012 Statistical Abstract. [Ehlektronnyj resurs] Rezhim dostupa: http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/cats/banking_fi nance_insurance. html, svobodnyj. Zagl. s ehkrana. Yaz. angl. (data obrascheniya: fevral' 2012 g.).

U.S. Small Business Administration (2012). [Ehlektronnyj resurs] Offi ce of Advocacy, All Industries Employment Size of Firm. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.sba.gov/sites/default/fi les/static_us.xlsx, svobodnyj. Zagl. s ehkrana. Yaz. angl. (data obrascheniya: fevral' 2012 g.).

Vasko T. (1990). Life Cycles and Long Waves. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

White House (2012). Table 10.1– Gross Domestic Product and Defl ators Used in the Historical Tables: 1940–2017. [Ehlektronnyj resurs] The White House. President Obama. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.whitehouse. gov/omb/budget/Historicals, svobodnyj. Zagl. s ehkrana. Yaz. angl. (data obrascheniya: fevral' 2012 g.)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate