MODELING OF TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS, ORDERLINESS AND DIGITAL ECONOMY

Kozyrev, Anatoly

English

Home>Issue 4>MODELING OF TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS, ORDERLINESS AND DIGITAL ECONOMY

MODELING OF TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS, ORDERLINESS AND DIGITAL ECONOMY

Table of contents

Annotation Estimate Publication content

References Comments

MODELING OF TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS, ORDERLINESS AND DIGITAL ECONOMY

Annotation

PII

S042473880000616-6-1

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Anatoly Kozyrev Send message

Edition

Volume 47 Issue 4

Pages

131-142

Abstract

The orderliness role in digital economy is investigated. It is shown that L.V. Kantorovichs idea about replacement of usual addition with maximum operation can have many applications in models of digital economy.

Keywords

orderliness, idempotent addition, content, price discrimination

Date of publication

02.10.2011

Number of purchasers

Views

907

Readers community rating

0.0 (0 votes)

Cite Download pdf

GOST	Kozyrev A. MODELING OF TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS, ORDERLINESS AND DIGITAL ECONOMY // Economics and the Mathematical Methods. – 2011. – V. 47. – Issue 4 C. 131-142 .
MLA	Kozyrev, Anatoly "MODELING OF TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS, ORDERLINESS AND DIGITAL ECONOMY." Economics and the Mathematical Methods. 47.4 (2011).:131-142.
APA	Kozyrev A. (2011). MODELING OF TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS, ORDERLINESS AND DIGITAL ECONOMY. Economics and the Mathematical Methods. vol. 47, no. 4, pp.131-142


1

References

Additional sources and materials


 
 Busygin V.P., Zhelobod'ko E.V., Tsiplakov A.A. (2003): Mikroehkonomika -tretij uroven'. Novosibirsk: SO RAN.
 Danilov V.I., Koshevoj G.A., Sotskov A.I. (1993): Ehkonomicheskoe ravnovesie na rynke intellektual'nykh tovarov//Ehkonomika i mat. metody. T. 29. Vyp. 4.
 Dolgin A.B. (2010): Manifest novoj ehkonomiki. Vtoraya nevidimaya ruka rynka. M.: OOO "Izdatel'stvo AST".
 Kolmogorov A.N. (1965): Tri podkhoda k opredeleniyu ponyatiya "kolichestvo informatsii"//Problemy peredachi informatsii. T. 1. № 1.
 Lourens P.A. (2011): Kak izmerenie vredit nauke. V sb.: "Igra v tsifir', ili Kak teper' otsenivayut trud uchenogo (sbornik statej po bibliometrike)". M.: MTsNMO.
 Makarov V.L. (1973): Balans nauchnykh razrabotok i algoritm ego resheniya. V sb.: "Optimizatsiya". Novosibirsk. 1973. Vyp. 11 (28).
 Makarov V.L. (2003): Ehkonomika znanij: uroki dlya Rossii//Vestnik Rossijskoj akademii nauk. T. 73. № 5.
 Makarov V.L. (1976): Model' ehkonomicheskogo ravnovesiya, uchityvayuschaya novovvedeniya. V sb.: "Optimizatsiya". Novosibirsk. Vyp. 18.
 Makarov V.L., Klejner G.B. (2007): Mikroehkonomika znanij. M.: Ehkonomika.
 Maslov V.P., Kolokol'tsev V.N. (1994): Idempotentnyj analiz i ego primenenie v optimal'nom upravlenii. M.: Fizmatlit.
 Makhlup F. (1966): Proizvodstvo i rasprostranenie znanij v SShA. M.: Progress.
 Smit G. (2010): Otsenka tovarnykh znakov. M.: ZAO ID "Kvinto-Konsalting".
 Taleb N.N. (2011): Chernyj lebed'. Pod znakom nepredskazuemosti. M.: KoLibri, Azbuka-Attikus.
 Arrow K.J. (1962): Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In: "Collected Papers of Kenneth J. Arrow". Vol. 5. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
 Demsetz H. (1970): The Private Production of Public Goods. 13 Journal of Law and Economics.
 Detering D. (2001): Okonomie der Medieninhalte. Allokative Effi zienz und Chancengleichheit in den Neuen Medien, LIT Verlag, Munster; (sokraschennyj variant -Detering D. How to Charge Lindahl Prices for IP goods -dostupen po ssylke: http://www.medieninhalte.de/article.htm.
 Griliches Z. (1990): Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey//J. of Econ. Literature. Vol. XXYIII.
 Karaganis J. (ed.): (2011): Media piracy in emerging economies. Published by the Social Science Research Council ([ehlektronnyj resurs] Rezhim dostupa: http://piracy.ssrc.org, svobodnyj. Yaz. angl.).
 Katz A. (2005): A Network Effects Perspective on Software Piracy//University of Toronto Law J. U Toronto Law and Economics Research Paper № 03-01. Vol. 55.
 Katz M.L., Shapiro C. (1985): Network Externalities, Competition and Compatibility//American Econ. Rev. Vol. 75.
 Katz M.L., Shapiro C. (1994): Systems Competition and Network Effects. 8 Journal of Economic Perspectives.
 Liebowitz S.J., Watt R. (2007): How to Best Ensure Remuneration for Creators in the Market for Music? [ehlektronnyj resurs] Copyright and its Alternatives working paper 01, SERCI_WPS01 (pdf). Rezhim dostupa: http://www.serci.org/default.asp, svobodnyj. Yaz. angl.).
 Mackie C. (2009): Intangible Assets: Measuring and Enhancing Their Contribution to Corporate Value and Economic Growth: Summary of a Workshop. [Ehlektronnyj resurs] Washington, National Research Council. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12745.html, svobodnyj. Yaz. angl.
 Machlup F. (1962): The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. Princeton.
 Musgrave R.A. (1983): Public Goods. In: Brown E.C., Solow, R.M. (Eds.) "Paul Samuelson and Modern Economic Theory". N.Y.
 Pickhardt M. (2001): Fifty Years after Samuelson's. The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure" 52nd International Atlantic Economic Conference Philadelphia, USA, 12-14 October.
 Samuelson P.A. (1954): The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure. 36 Review of Economics and Statistics.
 Smith G. (1997): Trademark Valuation. John Willey & Sons, Inc.
 Stigler G. (1961): The Economics of Information//The J. of Political Econ. Vol. 69. № 3.
 Sveiby K.E. (1998): What is information? [Ehlektronnyj resurs] Rezhim dostupa: http://www.sveiby.com/articles/Information.html, svobodnyj. Yaz. angl. (data obnovleniya 31 dekabrya 1998).
 Varian H.R. (1998): Markets for Information Goods. [Ehlektronnyj resurs] Rezhim dostupa: http://www.sims. berkeley.edu/~hal/people/hal/papers.html, svobodnyj. Yaz. angl. (data obnovleniya 16 oktyabrya 1998).