MARKET STRUCTURING AS AN INSTRUMENT OF THE STATE INDUSTRIAL POLICY
Table of contents
Share
Metrics
MARKET STRUCTURING AS AN INSTRUMENT OF THE STATE INDUSTRIAL POLICY
Annotation
PII
S042473880000616-6-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Georgy Kolesnik 
Nikolay Shvets
Pages
85-95
Abstract

One of the instruments of market competition regulation is the formation of a hierarchical structure of producers by providing some of them with the preferential terms of business. In addition to changes in market prices, the sale of privileges to producers allows consumer to extract additional income. The authors study the impact of the privileges in the form of long-term agreements on the market equilibrium and consumer surplus. It is shown that long-term agreements are effective for consumer at the markets with а small number of participants. The infl uence of transaction costs on the optimal market contracting structure is analyzed.

Keywords
competition, market, privileges, welfare, hierarchical system, regulation, industrial policy, procurement activity, long-term agreement, import substitution
Date of publication
01.10.2015
Number of purchasers
0
Views
112
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

To download PDF you should sign in

1

References



Additional sources and materials

Avdasheva S., Kudrin A. (2013). Zadachi torgovykh politik chastnykh kompanij kak instrumenta regulirovaniya i razvitiya konkurentsii: mirovoj opyt i popytka prognoza // Ehkonomicheskaya politika. № 5. S. 106–126.

Avdasheva S.B., Shastitko A.E., Kuznetsov B.V. (2006). Konkurentsiya i struktura rynkov: chto my mozhem uznat' iz ehmpiricheskikh issledovanij o Rossii // Rossijskij zhurnal menedzhmenta. T. 4. № 4. S. 3–22.

Antipov V., Bobrovich V., Myskin R. (2013). Znachimost' ofseta rastet. Iz opyta mirovoj praktiki ehksporta vooruzhenij // Voenno-promyshlennyj kur'er. № 8(476).

Artyakov V.V., Chemezov S.V. (2004). Offsetnaya deyatel'nost' sub'ektov voenno-tekhnicheskogo sotrudnichestva: problemy i perspektivy razvitiya. M.: Granitsa.

Bendikov M.A., Frolov I.Eh. (2007). Vysokotekhnologichnyj sektor promyshlennosti Rossii: sostoyanie, tendentsii, mekhanizmy innovatsionnogo razvitiya. M.: Nauka.

Godovoj otchet OAO “FSK EEhS” – 2013. (2014). [Ehlektronnyj resurs] Rezhim dostupa: http://www.fsk-ees. ru/about/management_and_control/test/god_otchet_FSK_ EES_2013.pdf, svobodnyj. Zagl. s ehkrana. Yaz. rus. (data obrascheniya: maj 2015 g.). S. 54.

Golichenko O.G. (2011). Osnovnye faktory razvitiya natsional'noj innovatsionnoj sistemy. M.: Nauka.

Klochkov V.V., Kritskaya S.S., Molchanova E.V. (2013). Lokalizatsiya vysokotekhnologichnykh proizvodstv i natsional'nye interesy Rossii // Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost'. № 35. S. 21–29.

Kolesnik G.V. (2013). Analiz vertikal'nykh ehffektov konkurentsii firm na ierarkhicheskikh rynkakh // Ehkonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoj Rossii. № 1. S. 25–38.

Kontseptsiya dolgosrochnogo sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossijskoj Federatsii na period do 2020 goda (utv. Rasporyazheniem Pravitel'stva RF ot 17 noyabrya 2008 g. № 1662-r) (2008). [Ehlektronnyj resurs] Rezhim dostupa: http://base.garant.ru/194365/, svobodnyj. Zagl. s ehkrana. Yaz. rus. (data obrascheniya: maj 2015 g.).

Shvets N.N., Kolesnik G.V. (2014). Lokalizatsiya proizvodstva ehlektrotekhnicheskogo oborudovaniya kak faktor obespecheniya ehnergeticheskoj bezopasnosti gosudarstva v usloviyakh global'nogo rynka // Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost'. № 16. S. 37–45.

Burguet R., Perry M. (2009). Preferred Suppliers in Auction Markets // RAND Journal of Economics. Vol. 40. No 2. P. 283–295.